As this nation observes the 50th
Anniversary of the March on Washington and its centerpiece event, Dr. Martin
Luther King, Jr’s I Have a Dream speech,
it is worth asking: what would Dr. King
think of contemporary life in the United States of America 50 years after his
soaring, prophetic words confronted and challenged the nation?
No doubt, Dr. King would
recognize that tremendous progress has been made on issues of race and racial
reconciliation in America. A majority of
Americans voted for a person of color, Barak Obama, to be President of the
United States, not once, but twice, even amidst the strains of an unstable
struggling economy. Many Americans live
in integrated communities and have deep relationships with others that cross
racial boundaries. In many workplaces people of diverse racial and ethnic
backgrounds happily work together, and although the top positions in corporate
America are still predominately held by white males, some inroads are being
made. In lots of schools, playgrounds
and on playing fields, white children hold hands with black children fulfilling
an explicit hope of Dr. King’s dream. Television
shows, commercials and print ads feature an increasingly wide variety of
persons pitching products to diverse audiences.
Houses of worship are somewhat less segregated at worship time on Sunday
morning. None of this was the case when
Martin Luther King spoke in Washington D.C. fifty years ago.
Still, significant problems continue
to confront us as a nation. The angry
divide over what many feel certain was an unjust verdict in the Trayvon Martin
slaying reveals the on-going chasm of mistrust along racial lines. Purposeful dialogue, sharing of stories and
experiences, and intentional relationship building between people of different
races and ethnic backgrounds continues to be sorely needed in the United States
today.
If he were alive, I’m certain Dr.
King would set his sights on the persistent achievement gap in education. African-Americans, Native Americans and
Hispanics continue to lag behind Whites and Asians in educational achievement
in this country. There has been marked
improvement in the decades since Dr. King’s assassination, but he would, I am
sure, urge us on as the value of an education is still the best ticket to
social and economic parity in this country.
Nonetheless, schools in poor communities are badly under-resourced and
whites have greater access both to private schools and to high-achieving public
schools. There is still tremendous work
to be done on this front.
If Dr. King were alive today, he
would unquestionably recognize our nation’s criminal justice and prison system
as a focal point of mean inequity and injustice. The United States is second only to Russia in having the highest incarceration rate in the world. Approximately 740 persons per 100,000 are in
prison in this country compared to 120 per 100,000 in China. In the
United States, a shamefully disproportionate number of the prison population is
made up of young black and Hispanic men.
In the United States, Prisons
have become a “growth industry” as we have become increasingly dependent upon a
privatized prison system. This creates a
profit incentive to increase the number of incarcerated persons. The immorality of this should challenge us
all, as it did many students and faculty of Florida Atlantic University in Boca
Raton. This past year, they rose up in
protest when GEO, a giant, international, corporation, which bills itself “the
world's leading provider of correctional, detention, and community reentry
services,” attempted to purchase the naming rights of the FAU football stadium
for a $6 million donation. F.A.U. faculty
and students were successful in preventing this renaming (playing upon the
school’s mascot, one clever person dubbed the stadium “Owlcatraz!”). In the wake of this debacle and other
missteps, the F.A.U. President was forced to resign.
Incarcerating persons should not
be the happy enterprise of entrepreneurs in a laissez faire corporate climate loosed from moral accountability and
responsibility. Incarcerating persons
should be the reluctant chore of the state, heavily regulated, with very close
oversight and accountability to the general public rather than a body of
shareholders. No one should profit from
its misery.
Moreover, incarceration often
demands forced labor, “chain gangs.” Our nation has legitimized a contemporary
form of slavery and made it socially acceptable. Yes, prisoners receive nominal pay, but the
system charges them back room, board, restitution and other expenses, often
more than their income provides. And
what is the driving force for the massive number of incarcerations in this
country that catches a disproportionate number of black and Hispanic men in its
dragnet? A failed war on drugs, and a
system which punishes and recidivates rather than rehabilitates and heals! If he were alive today, no doubt, Dr. King’s
prophet’s sword of a tongue would decry our nation’s criminal justice and prison
system as a primary perpetuator of institutional and systemic racism.
Above all, I am convinced that if
Dr. King were alive today, had his life not been cut short by an assassin’s
bullet from a high powered rifle, he would decry this nation’s obsession with
guns and our complacency about gun violence.
I am confident Dr. King would have been anguished, with the rest of us,
at the killing of 26 innocent children and adults at Sandy Hook Elementary
School on December 14 of last year. He
would have been horrified, as we all should be, that the American reaction to
the deaths of those innocent children and adults was to buy more guns, so that
additional violence will inevitably be inflicted upon our nation. Our
nation’s obsession and worship of guns has become in many instances a clear form
of idolatry – “gunolatry.”
I believe Dr. King would have
wondered, and would have provoked our nation’s conscience, by asking us why the
sadness, grief and outrage, which understandably and appropriately surged after
Sandy Hook, which understandably and appropriately surged after Columbine and
Aurora and Virginia Tech and the other 30 or so mass shootings which have
occurred in the last decade, have not
been equally pronounced or deep for the exceptionally high number of black
victims, especially young black males and young black children who die from gun
violence each year across our nation.
In the City of Trenton where I now
live, there have been 31 homicides since January 1. This ties the record in Trenton for the most
homicides in a year. The previous record
was set in 2005. No doubt that record
will be surpassed in the four months remaining in 2013. Of the 31
homicide victims in Trenton, almost all were young black men, a few were
Hispanic and one was a 42 year old black woman.
The most recent victim, Jafar Lewis, was a 26 year-old city resident who
was shot dead this past Friday night.
Two police officers were also shot in recent days, one is still in the
hospital as a result of his wounds.
According to the FBI, in 2008,
the most recent year for which I could find statistics, there were 6,841 black
homicide victims in the United States.
Black males between 17 and 29 make up almost half of all gun homicides
in this country. As one reliable source
notes, black American are six times more likely than white Americans to be victims
of gun violence, and seven times more likely to commit homicide with a
gun. Guns and gun violence are an
epidemic problem in this nation and visit death inequitably within the black
community.
Some shrug this off, declaring that
these kinds of deaths are mostly “about young black men from the poor part of
town killing other young black men from the poor part of town” as though that
were a negligible thing. “It's mostly a matter of thugs killing thugs,"
Rod Dreher declared last year in a blog entry on January 14, 2013 which focused
on gun violence in Baton Rouge, Louisiana.[2]
In a thoughtful response to Dreher, David
Frum, a contributing writer at CNN, editor of Newsweek, and former Special
Assistant to President George W. Bush wrote, “many of those seeming thugs are
carrying guns for the same reason that people who consider themselves
respectable carry them: in a futile quest to protect themselves with greater
firepower.”[3] Frum observes, “One person can find safety
that way. But if two people carry
firearms, a confrontation that might otherwise have ended in words or blows
ends instead with one man dead, and the other man on his way to prison for life.”
Frum continues, “Widespread gun ownership means not only more gun killings, but
also more gun maimings and cripplings…. Those young men in Baton Rouge [and
Trenton, Camden and other cities large and small!], who are killing each other
in such horrific numbers do not manufacture their own guns. They did not
organize the gun trade that brings the guns to their town. They did not write
the laws that prevent their town government from acting against guns. They
carry guns -- and misuse guns -- thanks to a national system of gun regulation
that makes guns easily accessible to those least likely to use guns
responsibly. The gun laws intended to
put guns into the hands of ‘good guys’ are the laws that also multiply guns in
the hands of ‘bad guys’ -- bad guys who might not have become such bad guys if
the guns had not been available to their hands.”
Frum’s conclusion? “The price of redefining gun violence as an
issue pertaining only to ‘those people’ -- of casting and recasting the gun
statistics to make them less grisly if only ‘those people’ are toted under some
different heading in some different ledger -- the price of that redefinition is
to lose our ability to think about the problem at all.”[4]
There are those who argue, “Guns
aren’t the problem, people are.” Sadly,
this thinking is wrong. Guns are the
problem…. Access to guns is the problem, easy access, especially to handguns
and military-style assault weapons with high-capacity magazines. Our nation has, by far, the highest rate of
gun deaths in the industrialized world.
Nearly 30,000 people per year in this country die from gun violence. No other so-called developed country is even
close. The numbers are inarguable. The conclusion is irrefutable: where there
are more guns there are not only more gun deaths, there are more violent deaths
overall, a lot more! I believe it is well
past time for people of faith to name the evil of gun violence without
equivocation and to stand our ground in calling for significant and meaningful
Gun Reform. It is time for us to reject
“Gunolatry” and all of its attendant ills and evils.
There are estimated to be more than 228 million
Christians in this country. Surely,
enough of us accept the gospel of peace preached by Jesus Christ to stand up to
the gospel of violence preached by gun lobbyists and gun manufacturers. On this 50th anniversary of the
March on Washington, I am confident that this is the work Dr. King’s legacy calls
us to. I am confident this is what Jesus
would have us do. It is time to reject the nightmare and embrace
the dream: Dr. King’s dream which is
actually the dream of the kingdom of God.
[1] I
first developed the thoughts in this reflection in a sermon I preached on the
occasion of The Martin Luther King, Jr. Community Observance held at St. Paul’s
Episcopal Church in Delray Beach, Florida on January 20, 2013.
[2] Dreher,
Rod Janaury 14, 2013 “Who kills, who dies, in Baton Rouge” The American Conservative - http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/who-kills-who-dies-baton-rouge/.
[3]
See Frum, David, “America’s Gun Problem is Not a Race Problem” CNN website,
January 16, 2013 at http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/15/opinion/frum-guns-race/index.html)
[4]
Frum
